🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to pull out from an global treaty designed to protect women from abuse, including family violence, following prolonged and heated discussions in the legislature.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in Riga this week to oppose the vote. The final decision now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last year, mandating governments to develop laws and support services to end all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial European Union member to begin the process of withdrawing from the treaty. Turkey withdrew in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations described as a major regression for gender equality.

Political Debate and Opposition

The treaty was ratified by the EU in last year, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its emphasis on gender equality undermines traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted 56 to 32 to exit from the treaty, a move proposed by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Reactions

One of the primary political groups advocating for the exit is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official urged the treaty not to be made political, while the group Equality Now stated it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent vote has sparked widespread outcry both within the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a national appeal calling for the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a protest for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Possible Next Steps

The leader of the European organization's legislative body commented that Latvia had made a rash choice driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey left the convention four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not achieve a two-thirds support, the president could potentially return the legislation for additional review if he holds concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics stated on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to constitutional requirements, "considering governmental and judicial considerations, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a concerning situation for women's rights not only in our nation but across Europe," stated a human rights advocate.

• Family violence rates have been increasing in multiple EU countries
• The European treaty requires specific legal protections for victims of domestic abuse
• The nation's vote could affect comparable debates in additional EU countries